🔗 Share this article

The Evolution of a Movement is often defined by specific steps.

1. The Big Idea

An inspiring figure or figureheads introduce a revolutionary approach that promises a cure for struggling players.

So here we are. Preparations are underway to challenge the establishment in Australia. The gunships are circling. Conflict emerges from within. One individual, vulnerable, anxious, the slogan POSITIVE INTENT smeared across his chest as a symbol, has emerged through the lines and is taken aside with discretion to a different team elsewhere.

Do you recall the start, when optimism reigned? The days of Bazball 1.0, of Bazball without brains.

2. Love-Bombing

Cult leaders guarantee a fresh beginning, a brighter tomorrow, support, success within a community with shared faith in the method.

How did it feel back then? A team united feeling good. Body art. Strength. Jawlines. Elite male wellness energy. Oh sure, The squad insist they don’t use the label, amusingly since it’s not recognized, what did we see?

But we know what it is. It’s the player playing a shot so unconventional it defies description. It’s the thrill of the leader in his final form, an expression conveying: focused titan, beard made of wood, natural look, genuinely raw you half-expect to glance over and find him positioned on the ground bare-chested embracing nature.

It’s the batsman still being allowed speaking publicly, out there looking like a joyful figure in a waistcoat, saying stuff like we’re breaking down traditions. And yes, the vibe, initially, was only good energy.

3. The Growth Phase

Building period. Unity enforced by rote learning of key phrases. These beliefs can appear contradictory to prove commitment.

Is it just me? The reaction, the outrage, the sense of betrayal after the first Ashes Test defeat seems too strong, too much. England batted badly on the field, as is typical there. They were torn apart in the field for a couple of hours when tactics failed, manipulated by the opponent batting like England but better, responsive to the situation, a man playing with aura.

Now there is the criticism, the anger, the perception of the team as a failure. The consensus is that losing isn’t enough, they must be humbled, to be purged, obliterated, overwhelmed via traditional methods of Mitchell Starc’s movements, the simple basics of Scott Boland, marking achievements with a bashful smile like he’s just been given a rewarding prize. What will this do to them?

4. Hate Bonding

Problems arise due to setbacks. Yet, mistakes are denied. It starts to feed on hatred of the outside world.

In truth, a few days before the next match, we have now reached an intriguing moment in the story of this approach. Victory is possible overseas through aggressive play. More likely, they could lose just as quickly. And if they do lose it seems we really might be entering the death cult phase.

Prior to that, there are two things to note on the topic. Previously, back in those heady early days, of light and heat, I wrote an article labeling it a movement. There was outrage, which was helpful as it’s known a method to show lack of cult status is if supporters send hundreds of furiously one-eyed messages denying scrutiny of the beliefs.

What has happened in the last few days are fascinating. Opposition to the style has now become the cult. We have a uniformly angry internet, angry English pundits, pictures of upset travelling fans missing out on play, similar to people wanting fairness.

On the other hand, we have the wider backdrop of Australia’s more nuanced deep-seated frustration with the aggressive tourists, out there saying, hey, that thing you love and have fostered and nurtured to distinguish yourselves culturally from us, well, it’s all a bit of a gag in the end old boy.

This is the core issue. All movements are similar. The style was a trend since the sport itself is insular. Or at least, English cricket has always been a cult, a group, a private event, an insular community with a long history of opaque and ritualistic cult history defining it. This has always been a place where power and access are hoarded. It’s the imperial sport of the British, the early image-makers. And surprisingly, the nation has its own culture, a series of esoteric hierarchies, a royal family remains.

England’s cricketers have been sealed up in this system from a young age. Seeking change, to create a less brutal environment, they are just repeating their own experience, creating another a bubble, a closed circle, but now with 15 cool guys and a leader encouraging individuality provided you conform.

Live where your feet are. Run towards the danger. Despite efforts, things stay similar.

With this mind, it is perhaps the moment to show understanding for the movement, to acknowledge its merits, that are numerous. What does it represent? Promoting liberation. Defying norms. Batting aggressively|Attacking with