🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an charming little “playful character”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a big but fiercely protective friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and moves like a worm. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a gentle spirit.

Thirty captive marine mammals in a Canada-based amusement park have been caught in a tussle between a closed attraction, public officials and advocacy groups.

But those most familiar with the whales say the heated debate over their fate often ignores the individual traits of the whales who, after living their entire lives in enclosed habitats, have been carefully observed by the people who see them each day.

After the Canadian government prevented the transfer of the belugas to China, the struggling facility near Niagara Falls where they are housed threatened to end their lives unless the government covers the expense of their survival. Canada’s marine resources official has rejected that demand, placing the thirty whales in an ever more uncertain situation.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Scientists say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their mimicry abilities, problem solving and communal behavior indicate they are deeply intelligent creatures – something Kristy Burgess observed personally.

She spent a significant period as a marine mammal specialist, a position that required building relationships of the aquatic animals.

“Developing those relationships over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of love. At the beginning, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “In time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so magical and rewarding.”

The trainer knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was even so astounded by the details and idiosyncrasies in their dispositions. She formed a special affection for a pair of whales with opposing natures.

“Eve selected me. Cleo demanded work,” she said. “Both altered the way I view relationships.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Her connection with the whales developed against a background of increasing societal concern to their captivity.

During her three years at the facility, seven belugas and the park’s single killer whale, the orca, succumbed. In all, 19 belugas have died at the park since recent years, a toll which the facility links to expected lifespan, but which campaigners say reflects the poor conditions in which they were kept.

The facility did not open to the visitors over the recent season, but Burgess says she observed directly effects of the cessation. “Structural materials is falling apart from the enclosures because they’re degrading and not being repaired. The whales are curious and so they grab fragments and swim around with fragments in their mouth. It’s heartbreaking to see.”

The park did not reply to a questionnaire, but in the past asserted: “The whales … obtain far superior veterinary services and constant supervision than any person in the Britain, or other places.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was dismissed from the park in early March following the death of a beluga, an unwell beluga the caretakers had to euthanize. She said the park suspected information of the incident were shared to the press and she was released not long after.

The uncertainty over the whales’ outcome has left her and staff members in distress. She says the facility’s ultimatum to kill its whales is a leverage tool and is a “practically unfeasible” undertaking, adding any attempts to put down even a single beluga would require “immense manpower”, equipment and machinery.

“There’s no way in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess supports demands for the whales to be transferred right away from the park, with its deteriorating pools and reduced personnel.

In recent months, the nation’s government official turned down a proposal to transfer the whales to an overseas location.

“To approve the proposal would have meant a perpetual life in confinement and a reversion to display for amusement,” the minister commented. “As society, we know that whales should be in the wild, not in enclosures for our enjoyment. I could not in good conscience approve an export that would continue the conditions these belugas have endured.”

But the former trainer said the minister’s remarks reflect a more general incorrect perception of the facts of existence for belugas born in captivity.

“The society needs to grasp these are whales that have spent their whole lives in confinement and they will need human care for the rest of their years,” she said. “People just don’t understand that it’s not as simple as saying ‘close it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate

As decision makers struggle to find a resolution, suggestions have been put forward, some of which have little basis in reality. An idea called for the belugas to be released into the wilds of northern regions – where whales are a important part of nourishment for Indigenous peoples.

A planned protected area in the region of eastern Canada, which now received regulatory clearance, has been contentious. The prospective facility, which includes 100 acres of penned in ocean, remains undeveloped. Proponents remain positive that it could ultimately represent a sustainable answer for some of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s discussed with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “merely an experiment” in the whales’ well-being.

Others say the possibility of a sanctuary indicates a broader global shift away from animal displays and could represent a viable approach in the near future.

The project lead, director of the initiative, said the site will mimic the cognitive activities and feeding regimen the whales receive from specialists, albeit in a significantly bigger space. He said after the health of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|